Initiate Justice Action

Proposition 34 |
Health Care
Provider Spending

IJ Action Recommendation: VOTE NO

Description

Healthcare Provider Spending

Background

This measure would require certain health care organizations that benefit from a federal drug discount program to spend 98% of revenues on direct patient care. The measure applies only to health care providers that: spent over $100,000,000 in any ten-year period on anything other than direct patient care; and operated multifamily housing with over 500 high-severity health and safety violations. It also penalizes noncompliance by revoking health care licenses and tax-exempt status. Permanently authorizes the state to negotiate Medi-Cal drug prices on a statewide basis.

Supporters

Funders: California Apartment Association

Organizations: YES ON 34, PROTECT PATIENTS NOW: A COALITION OF WOMEN, VETERANS, LGBTQ+ ADVOCATES, AND PATIENT GROUPS, SPONSORED BY CALIFORNIA APARTMENT ASSOCIATION

Opponents

Funders: AIDS Healthcare Foundation

Organizations: STOP THE REVENGE INITIATIVE - NO ON 34, SPONSORED BY AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION

IJ Action Recommendation

IJ Action recommends a no vote on Proposition 34 because it represents a thinly veiled attempt by the apartment association and their corporate allies to stifle efforts to enact rent control and repeal the disastrous Costa Hawkins law.

Website

Yes on Prop 34: https://yesonprop34.com/ 

No on Prop 34: https://www.noon34.org/